-
摘要: 本文列举了诸多工程领域中的液体共振运动现象,详细探讨了船舱中伴有剧烈流动的晃荡问题.描述了基于理论分析的非线性多模态方法,该方法便于波动稳定性分区、多分支解和物理稳定性的研究.强调了方形舱、垂向圆柱舱以及球形舱内伴有旋转和混沌(不规则波动)的三维流动的重要性.晃荡引起的砰击涉及到各种各样的内流条件,这些条件随液体深度与舱体长度之比而变化.针对棱柱状LNG舱,讨论了许多与流体力学和热力学参数、影响砰击载荷效应的水弹性以及模型实验缩尺比的物理现象.Abstract: Resonant liquid motions in various engineering fields are exemplified. Sloshing in ship tanks associated with violent flow are discussed in detail. A nonlinear analytically based multimodal method that facilitates investigations of wave regimes, multi-branched solutions and physical stability is described. The importance of 3D flow with, for instance, swirling and chaos in nearly square-base tanks as well as in vertical cylindrical and spherical tanks is emphasized. Sloshing-induced slamming involves a broad variety of inflow conditions that depend on the liquid depth-to-tank length ratio. The many physical phenomena involving fluid mechanic and thermodynamic parameters as well as hydroelasticity effecting slamming load effects and associated scaling from model to full scale for prismatic liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanks are discussed.
-
Key words:
- multimodal method /
- sloshing /
- wave regimes /
- slamming /
- hydroelasticity /
- model test scaling
-
Figure 1. Examples of typical periodic (steady-state) free-surface motions for shallow (a), intermediate (b), nearly critical (c), and finite (d) liquid depth conditions for forced horizontal oscillations with period T near the highest natural sloshing period T1 of two-dimensional flow in a rectangular tank. Shallow liquid conditions (a) are for h/l=0.125, h/l=0.125 , T/T1=1. The forcing amplitude to tank breadth ratio is 0.1. Nearly-critical depth conditions (c) are for h/l = 0.35, T/T1 = 0.787
Figure 2. Experimental and theoretical stability boundaries T,S, and P for non-dimensional filling depth h/R0=0.6 and different longitudinal forcing amplitudes ε=η1a/R0 versus non-dimensional forcing frequency σ/σ11. Empty (stable) and solid (unstable) symbols are experimental bounds taken from Sumner and Stofan (1963) . The symbols related to S are covered by a shadow area. Theoretical stability boundaries are marked by the solid lines T, S, and P (Faltinsen & Timokha, 2013)
Figure 3. Dimensionless steady-state wave elevation near the vertical wall =(fmax - fmin)/h (as proposed by Chester and Bones(1968) ) versus the excitation frequency. Rectangular tank with water depth-to-tank breadth ratio h/l = 0.08333 and 2D flow. Horizontal harmonic excitations. The calculated data are for fresh water with kinematic viscosity coefficient ν=1.1×10−6m2⋅s−1. ◊ = experiments by Chester and Bones(1968) , dashed line = Boussinesq-type multimodal theory and solid line = theory by Chester (1968) . (a) η2a/l=0.001254, (b) η2a/l = 0.002583
-
[1] Abrahamsen B C, Faltinsen O M. 2011. The effect of air leakage and heat exchange on the decay of entrapped air pocket slamming oscillations. Physics of Fluids, 23:1-17. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2044466016&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [2] Abrahamsen B C, Faltinsen O M. 2012. The natural frequency of the pressure oscillations inside an air pocket which is entrapped between a water-wave and a plane wall. J. of Fluids and Structures, 35:200-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.07.004 [3] Ancellin M, Brosset L, Ghidaglia J M. 2012. Influence of phase transition on sloshing impact pressures described by a generalized Bagnold's model//The 22th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Rhodes, Greece. [4] Braeunig J P, Brosset L, Dias F, Ghidaglia J M. 2010. On the effect of phase transition on impact pressures due to sloshing//The 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China. [5] Chester W. 1968. Resonant oscillations of water waves. I. Theory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 306:5-22. [6] Chester W, Bones J A. 1968. Resonant oscillations of water waves. Ⅱ. Experiment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 306:23-30. [7] Faltinsen O M. 1997. The effect of hydroelasticity on slamming. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 355:575-591. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1997.0026 [8] Faltinsen O M. 2005. Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. New York:Cambridge University Press. [9] Faltinsen O M, Timokha A N. 2009. Sloshing. New York:Cambridge University Press. [10] Faltinsen O M, Firoozhkoohi R, Timokha A N. 2011a. Steady-state liquid sloshing in a rectangular tank with slat-type screen in the middle:Quasi-linear theory modal analysis and experiments. Physics of Fluids, 23:042101. doi: 10.1063/1.3562310 [11] Faltinsen O M, Firoozhkoohi R, Timokha A N. 2011b. Effect of central slotted screen with a high solidity ratio on the secondary resonance phenomenon for liquid sloshing in a rectangular tank. Physics of Fluids, 23:062106. doi: 10.1063/1.3602508 [12] Faltinsen O M, Timokha A N. 2012. Analytically approximate natural sloshing modes for a spherical tank shape. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 703:391-401. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2012.237 [13] Faltinsen O M, Timokha A N. 2013. Nonlinear sloshing in a spherical tank//32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Nantes, France. [14] Fredriksen A G, Kristiansen T, Faltinsen O M. 2015. Wave-induced response of a floating 2D body with moonpool. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences, 373:2033. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2181769825&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [15] Graczyk M. 2008. Experimental investigation of sloshing loading and load effects in membrane LNG tanks subjected random excitation.[PhD Thesis]. Department of Marine Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. [16] Guo X Y, Wang B L, Liu H. 2011. A numerical method for investigating free surface impact with air entrapment during sloshing. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 19:651-659 http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2466382208&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [17] Lugni C, Brocchini M, Faltinsen O M. 2006. Wave impact loads:The role of the flip-through. Physics of Fluids, 18:122101. doi: 10.1063/1.2399077 [18] Lugni C, Miozzi M, Brocchini M, Faltinsen O M. 2010a. Evolution of the air-cavity during a depressurized wave impact. Part I:The kinematic flow field. Physics of Fluids, 22:056101. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2081560618&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [19] Lugni C, Brocchini M, Faltinsen O M. 2010b. Evolution of the air-cavity during a depressurized wave impact. Part Ⅱ:The dynamic field. Physics of Fluids, 22:056102. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2081560618&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [20] Lugni C, Bardazzi A, Faltinsen O M, Graziani G. 2014. Hydroelastic slamming response in the evolution of a flip-through event during shallow-liquid sloshing. Physics of Fluids, 26:032108. doi: 10.1063/1.4868878 [21] Moiseev N N. 1958. On the theory of nonlinear vibrations of a liquid of finite volume. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (PMM), 22:860-872. doi: 10.1016/0021-8928(58)90126-6 [22] Rognebakke O F, Faltinsen O M. 2005. Sloshing induced impact with air cavity in rectactangular tank with high filling ratio. In:Twentieth International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Svalbard, Norway. [23] Sauret A, Boulogne F, Cappello J, Dressaire E, Stone H A. 2015. Damping of liquid sloshing by foams. Physics of Fluids, 27:243-257. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=1987683328&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [24] Sumner I E, Stofan A J. 1963. An experimental investigation of the viscous damping of liquid sloshing in spherical tanks. Tech. Report NASA, TN D-1991. [25] Wei Z J, Faltinsen O M, Lugni C, Yue Q J. 2015. Sloshing-induced slamming in screen-equipped rectangular tanks in shallow-water conditions. Physics of Fluids, 27:032104. doi: 10.1063/1.4913983