王鹏, 梁东, 赵锴等. 亚声速FADS系统设计及飞行试验评估. 力学与实践, xxxx, x(x): 1-8. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0879-24-230
引用本文: 王鹏, 梁东, 赵锴等. 亚声速FADS系统设计及飞行试验评估. 力学与实践, xxxx, x(x): 1-8. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0879-24-230
Wang Peng, Liang Dong, Zhao Kai, et al. Design of a subsonic fads system and flight test evaluation. Mechanics in Engineering, xxxx, x(x): 1-8. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0879-24-230
Citation: Wang Peng, Liang Dong, Zhao Kai, et al. Design of a subsonic fads system and flight test evaluation. Mechanics in Engineering, xxxx, x(x): 1-8. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0879-24-230

亚声速FADS系统设计及飞行试验评估

DESIGN OF A SUBSONIC FADS SYSTEM AND FLIGHT TEST EVALUATION

  • 摘要: 针对亚声速飞行器对高精度飞行参数的测控需求,研发了一套亚声速嵌入式大气数据传感(Flush Air Data Sensing, FADS)系统,集成工程样机,并通过风洞试验及飞行试验进行系统考核评估。基于CFD方法建立FADS系统压力数据库,并通过风洞试验考核了模型算法在低亚声速时的误差限;其次,集成融合实时解算算法的FADS工程原理样机;最后通过飞行试验考核了工程样机的工程适用性。结果表明,(1)与机载的其他独立测试系统相比,FADS攻角实时解算精度高,攻角偏差≤1°,关键段攻角偏差≤0.5°;事后重建的攻角数据与飞行试验FADS系统实时解算数据一致,证实FADS实时攻角解算方法可靠;(2)风洞及飞行试验校核数据表明, FADS实时攻角输出数据在飞行试验初始段的波动是由输入压力波动较大导致,特别是在高空低速段,输入压力波动幅值超过算法的误差限,导致实时攻角解算数值波动较大;(3)CFD仿真结果表明,输入压力波动位于算法误差限内对攻角输出精度影响较小,超过算法误差限的压力幅值波动对实时攻角输出精度影响极大。高空低速飞行器FADS系统对压力传感器等硬件精度及工程实现水平要求较高,应尽量保证工程实施精度。

     

    Abstract: In allusion to the high precision requirements for flight parameters, a subsonic Flush Air Data Sensing(FADS) system was developed and flight tested. First of all, the FADS pressure data was built based on Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) modeling, and error distribution bounds for pressure inputs was analyzed based on CFD modeling accuracy and wind tunnel calibration data. Secondly, real-time solution algorithm based on the surrogated model was analyzed and principle prototype was implemented. Finally, flight test were implemented to validate the FADS principle prototype. In order to evaluate the reliability of the real-time FADS angle of attack solving algorithm in flight test validation, the angle of attack solving algorithm based on the aerodynamic model was rebuilt afterwards. Systematic comparisons for angle of attack between FADS system and INS were determined. The results show that similar results are obtained from aerodynamic model and surrogated model, and the reliability. of angle of attack real-time solving algorithm is validated during flight test. Accuracy of real-time angle of attack solving algorithm is less than 1°, and even less than 0.5°during the key flight phase. Pressure inputs fluctuated abnormally exceeding error distribution bounds is the main factors caused the angle of attack data abnormity. The FADS solving algorithm determined by CFD modeling technology can set a allowable pressure inputs error bounds, and reasonable fluctuated pressure inputs have no influences on angle of attack. Therefore, angle of attack data abnormity is caused by pressure inputs fluctuated abnormally exceeding error distribution bounds. For the FADS system applied to a subsonic vehicle, pressure transducer accuracy and fine engineering implementation is necessary for high precision solution.

     

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map